Literary interdisciplinary research
sanaz khoshhesab; moosa parnian; soussan jabri
Abstract
Introduction
Nowadays, literary sociology theory, as an appropriate mechanism for recognition and social and cultural analysis, has been considered by literary scholars. Among the many works, stories are more inclusive of various social issues that can be studied more deeply than the writer's community. ...
Read More
Introduction
Nowadays, literary sociology theory, as an appropriate mechanism for recognition and social and cultural analysis, has been considered by literary scholars. Among the many works, stories are more inclusive of various social issues that can be studied more deeply than the writer's community. In the meantime, the titles of the stories as the first sign that the reader is encountered, reveal the secrets of the quality and content of the work, the thoughts and feelings of the author, and especially the environmental conditions of the creation of the work. Hence, the titles of the works represent both emotional, social, historical, indigenous and climatic situations and in a wider range of metaphors, metaphors, metaphors, allegories and compositions or symbolic phrases that convey their creator's feelings, thoughts and beliefs to the audience.
The question of this research is that what the social conditions surrounding the creation of the work have had in the title of contemporary stories from 1941 to 1978?
In this research, we have analyzed the titles of Persian stories from 1953 to 1978. The research method is a descriptive analysis which is done as a library method.
Review
Much has been said about contemporary fiction and the examination of various aspects of its long and short stories. Sometimes the works of a storyteller and sometimes periodically or stylistically examine.
In general, there has not been an independent research on the topic of "title" of Persian stories from 1953 to 1978 with a sociological approach.
Conclusion
In reviewing about 1200 of the titles of stories written in the years (1953-1978), we find that bitter streaks of despair, tyranny and repression of the coup of August 1953 (1953-1963) are seen in the story plans of post-coup years. In the second period (1963-1978), reactions to the sudden arrival of modernity and its influence on the social structure of traditional Iran are evident. The findings showed that the titles of the stories were influenced by the social conditions of the creation of the work following the plotting of the story in these two historical periods.
